ð ̿!!
ù° GM foods Ѱ̰ ι° ͽǾ ο ̾.
gm food µ ͽǾ ƾ...
صص ƿФФФФ..
ſ!
1.GM FOOD
What are you thinking about GM foods?
GM foods are harmful for us or helpful for us?
The reading part alleged that GM foods are good.
They said that GM foods have many merits. On contrast the listening part said GM foods have a lot of
problems. First, the reading part said that it has environmentally benefits Because when they are
nourishing the crops ,they don't need to use toxic pesticides. On the other hands, listening part said that
that time, they use herbicides so it makes other plants ruined. Second, the reading part alleged that GM
foods have health benefits. Because scientists can put some vitamins and minerals into GM foods.
Meanwhile, the listening part said that it causes many people suffer allergies like peanut allergy.
Last, the reading part said that GM foods have economic benefits because scientists can making the
crops bigger and faster than before. So farmers can earning more money than before.
Meanwhile, the listening part said that company should spend a lot of money for nourishing GM foods
and also it causes making more big gap between poor people and rich people.
So far they argued about GM foods. It has two opposite aspects.
What should we support between pros and cons?
2. SHAKKES PEARS
Is it true that All 37 plays and 154 poems written by shakespeare ?
Most people think that his all work are too much to do by himself.
So they argued about truth of the shakespeare's work.
First, the reading part suggested about his ability. Because he had just basic education and he couldn't
visit Rome, Greece, Spain, Italy..etc where there are background of the shakespeare's work.
But he used high- level language and described these places well. They said it is impossible.
Meanwhile the listening part said that he is genius and creative that's why it is possible.
Second, the reading part suspended about his English language skill.
Because Before publishing the English dictionary, he used advanced vocabularies.
On the other hand, the listening part said he is genius that's why it's possible.
Finally, the reading part alleged that there is no record about him as author.
So some another authors are regarded as shakespeare's substitute.
For examples, Francis Bacon and the Earl of Oxford .
But the listening part claimed that Earl of Oxford dead before 12 plays were written.
ٵ ѹغ!!
What do you think about this issue? Which opinion is correct?